The recent High Court proceedings brought by my good friend, Raja Miah MBE represent a significant victory for accountability in policing.
Raja pursued the claim with determination, assisted by me at UKCP in navigating the highly technical Judicial Review process which we sadly have some experience.
Through that work, Greater Manchester Police were ultimately forced to concede with their tail between their legs, that their decision was unlawful.
Judicial Review is often viewed as complex, costly, and inaccessible. However, this case demonstrates that determined individuals, supported by the right guidance, can successfully challenge unlawful conduct by powerful public bodies.
Raja’s persistence, combined with our assistace at UKCP in developing and advancing the legal challenge, ensured that the flaws in the police decision could not remain hidden.
Exposing Irrationality in Police Conduct
When police forces make decisions that are unlawful or irrational, the consequences extend far beyond the individual affected.
Such decisions undermine public confidence and erode the rule of law itself. In this case, the evidence revealed a decision that could not withstand our legal challange and a decision that the police unquestinable knew was unlawful and was suspected to be a tactical decison to deny Raja of the justice he deserves.
Assisting Raja in identifying the glaring legal errors of GMP and preparing the Judicial Review challenge, we helped bring those issues before the High Court, where the position ultimately became indefensible.
Holding Public Authorities to Account
UKCP frequently see situations where individuals face unlawful decisions but lack the knowledge or resources to challenge them. Public authorities often rely on the assumption that their decisions will never be tested. WRONG, we are building resources to hold them to account.
Cases like Raja’s demonstrate why scrutiny is essential. By helping individuals bring well-prepared challenges, we aim to ensure that unlawful decisions are not only overtunred, but the decision makers are exposed.
Challenging Unlawful Decisions
If you have been subjected to a police decision that appears unlawful ,irrational, or otherwise procedurally flawed, the law provides a mechanism to challenge it. JUDICIAL REVIEW.
Raja’s case and our previous cases, shows that the High Court will intervene where public authorities exceed their powers or act unlawfully. UKCP remains committed to assisting individuals for no charge who wish to challenge such decisions and to ensuring that accountability within policing is not merely theoretical, but real.
Judicial Reviews of police decisions are goverened by strict time constraints of 90 days from the impugned decision, within that time, you must follow preaction protocol before issuing your claim for Judicial review, if you have a matter that you think may need a Judicial Review it is imperative you act now.
?
You are exploiting Raja’s good name and good work to launder your own crappy name and crappy reputation. I hope Raja keeps his boundaries in place and does not allow your negative equity standing to sully his.
How do you work that out? As Raja clearly published in his YouTube broadcast, I assisted him as I have experience in JR’s. So maybe try getting your facts right
Well done paul another victory