In the United Kingdom, police investigations often involve inviting individuals to a voluntary attendance (VA), also known as a voluntary interview, as a first step in addressing alleged offences. Governed by the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE), particularly Code C and Code G, this process allows officers to question suspects without arresting them, balancing investigative needs with individual rights.
What is a Voluntary Attendance?
A voluntary attendance involves a person agreeing to attend a police station or another location for a recorded interview under caution. The caution informs you that
You do not have to say anything. But, it may harm your defence if you do not mention when questioned something which you later rely on in court. Anything you do say may be given in evidence.
Unlike an arrest, you are not detained and can leave at any time unless an arrest occurs during the interview. The process mirrors interviews under arrest, including the right to free legal advice, but lacks full custody safeguards like detention reviews.
Police must disclose the general nature of the allegation when arranging a VA, though detailed evidence may be shared later. This approach enables officers to explore complaints in a formal, recorded setting, often for offences like harassment or minor assaults.
No Requirement for Evidence to Invite a VA
A critical aspect of VAs is that police do not need evidence to invite you to attend. Under PACE, only suspicion of an offence is required before a caution can be given, yet in practice this threshold is applied so lightly that even a vague complaint can be enough.
Because attendance is voluntary and imposes no detention, courts rarely examine whether that suspicion was objectively reasonable. This makes the VA a convenient tool for officers to begin investigations with minimal information. It also gives them a strategic advantage: a recorded interview that may expose inconsistencies or admissions, gathered without the stricter safeguards that apply to arrest. As a result, police can and often do use VA’s to “fish” for information, knowing that the process carries little to no risk of civil liability so long as the suspect remains free to leave.
Arrest Necessity and Refusal to Attend
Declining a VA does not automatically lead to arrest. PACE Code G requires any arrest to meet a strict necessity test: officers must have reasonable suspicion of an offence and believe arrest is necessary for specific reasons, such as securing evidence, preventing harm, or ensuring a prompt investigation. A VA is often considered a practicable alternative, reducing the need for arrest if cooperation is likely or urgency is absent, but can be misused by the police.
Police may imply that non-attendance could lead to arrest to encourage participation, but this is not a legal obligation. If a VA is refused, officers must reassess whether arrest criteria are met. An arrest without reasonable suspicion or necessity could be deemed unlawful, potentially leading to civil claims for wrongful arrest or false imprisonment, as seen in cases like Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police v MR, where an unjustified arrest post-VA was successfully challenged.
Representation if you attend a VA.
Securing a reputable solicitor to represent you ahead of a voluntary attendance (VA) is a crucial step to ensure your rights are fully protected under PACE. A qualified solicitor brings extensive legal expertise and experience, offering tailored advice to navigate the complexities of a police interview, which could have significant implications for your future. Avoid relying on police station representatives who are not solicitors, as they often have limited knowledge of the law and are only required to pass basic assessments to provide assistance. In a potentially life-changing situation, their lack of depth could leave you vulnerable, so it’s wise to seek a solicitor with a proven track record, ideally one specialising in criminal law, who can attend the VA with you and provide robust representation.
Potential for Civil Action
If police proceed to arrest after a refused VA, they must fully comply with PACE requirements. Failure to meet the necessity test or lack of reasonable suspicion can render an arrest unlawful, exposing the police to civil action under claims like false imprisonment or breaches of the Human Rights Act 1998. Courts have awarded damages in such cases when arrests lack proper justification, placing the burden on police to demonstrate compliance.
For vulnerable individuals, such as those with neurodiversity, in-person interviews may accommodate specific needs, but legal protections remain unchanged. Solicitors often recommend attending VAs with representation to ensure fairness and safeguard rights. Solicitors would not advise against attending a VA because they would not risk you being arrested based on their advice. From a Solicitors perspective, a VA has the least risk and a criminal defence solicitor will have little consideration for an underlying civil claim, their primary objective is defending you in a criminal allegation, not assisting you with a potential civil claim.
In summary, voluntary attendances under PACE enable police to initiate investigations with minimal evidential requirements, offering a low-barrier method to gather information. However, any escalation to arrest must adhere to strict PACE criteria, ensuring accountability and protecting against unlawful actions.
Be the first to comment