Paul Ponting appeal to the IOPC over GMP unlawful decision UPHELD

The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) has upheld an appeal against the Greater Manchester Police (GMP) for their decision to take no further action on a complaint by Mr Paul Ponting (read here). Senior officers, including Inspector Paul Mycock and Superintendent Kernain (pictured below), had dismissed the complaint, but the IOPC’s review has now reversed that decision.

Background of Paul Ponting’s Complaint

Paul Ponting filed his complaint on 20 July 2023, accusing Superintendent Kernain of ignoring the Malicious Communication Act (MCA) 1988. He argued that Supt Kernain intentionally failed to follow the National Crime Recording Standard (NCRS) and therefore, intentionally failed to correct an abuse of power by Inspector Mycock, which he believed to be vexatious. GMP dismissed the complaint as being similar to a previous one, on which they had also taken no action.

IOPC’s Decision

The IOPC found GMP’s decision to be unreasonable and disproportionate. Despite the complaint’s perceived repetitiveness, the IOPC noted that GMP had not addressed specific concerns about the MCA 1988. The IOPC determined that GMP’s handling of the complaint lacked the thoroughness needed to resolve Mr Ponting’s concerns.

The IOPC review criticized the responses from Superintendent Kernain and Inspector Mycock. They highlighted inaccuracies in Kernain’s correspondence, such as misidentifying the method of communication and the nature of the alleged offence. Additionally, the IOPC noted that GMP failed to provide detailed reasoning, especially concerning the MCA 1988 and crime recording standards.

Implications of the Decision

This decision raises serious concerns about the actions of senior officers within GMP. It suggests that their dismissal of Paul Ponting’s complaint was unjustified and calls for a more in-depth investigation into their conduct.

The IOPC’s ruling requires GMP to reopen the investigation into Mr Ponting’s complaint. This process will focus on aspects related to the MCA 1988. The outcome emphasizes the importance of accountability and transparency within police forces, especially when senior officers are involved.

Conclusion

The IOPC’s decision to uphold the appeal by Paul Ponting is a significant step in addressing his concerns about GMP’s handling of his complaint. It highlights the need for strict adherence to legal standards in police complaints and ensures that such cases are treated with the seriousness they deserve. As GMP reopens the investigation, all eyes will be on the actions taken against the officers involved.