Disgraced and sacked GMP officer, Rick Pendlbury is head of Safeguarding for rape victims

Disgraced Former Police Officer in Safeguarding Role Raises Serious Concerns

Rick Pendlebury, a former Greater Manchester police officer who was sacked for dishonest behaviour after hacking into police computer systems, is now the head of safeguarding at a charity that supports victims of rape.

This appointment has raised significant concerns, particularly given recent allegations that Rick has been making false accusations to survivors supported by the charity.

Rick’s dismissal from the police force was a high-profile case, (read here) marking a severe breach of trust and professional ethics. His actions not only compromised sensitive information but also eroded the integrity of the police service. Despite this, Rick found his way into a position of considerable responsibility within a charitable organisation dedicated to supporting some of the most vulnerable individuals in society.

The charity in question, which we have not named for privacy reasons, is investigating the report.

The charity provides crucial support to survivors of rape, offering services such as counselling, legal advice, and safe spaces. The role of head of safeguarding is critical within this context, ensuring that survivors feel secure and supported as they navigate their recovery.

However, recent reports have surfaced indicating that Rick has been making false allegations to survivors, adding further distress to those who are already in a fragile state. These actions potentially undermine the credibility of the charity but also inflict additional trauma on survivors who are seeking help and support.

“Safeguarding is a role that requires the utmost integrity and empathy,” said one survivor who wishes to remain anonymous. “The appointment of someone with a history of dishonest behaviour, particularly one involving a breach of trust, is highly concerning. Survivors (of rape) need to know that they are in safe hands, and any behaviour that casts doubt on the credibility of the support they receive is unacceptable.”

The implications of Rick’s actions are far-reaching. False allegations can severely damage the trust between survivors and the organisations meant to protect them, potentially deterring others from seeking the help they desperately need. Furthermore, these allegations can lead to unnecessary investigations and legal repercussions, diverting resources away from genuine cases and support services.

The charity has announced that it is conducting an internal investigation however, it is not known if Rick has been suspended from his duties pending the outcome. However, the damage to its reputation and the well-being of the survivors it supports may already be done.

This situation highlights a broader issue within the charity sector regarding the oversight and accountability of those in safeguarding roles. It serves as a stark reminder that the safety and trust of vulnerable individuals should always be the highest priority, and any compromises in this area are simply unacceptable.

In conclusion, Rick’s tenure as head of safeguarding at a charity for rape survivors has underscored the critical importance of ensuring that individuals in such roles are of the highest ethical standards. His actions have not only betrayed the trust placed in him but have also inflicted further harm on those he was supposed to protect.

Moving forward, it is imperative that organisations implement stringent vetting procedures to prevent such scenarios from occurring, ensuring that the safety and well-being of survivors are never compromised.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.